<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Limey Report &#187; sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harlequinade.org/category/sequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harlequinade.org</link>
	<description>Life&#039;s essentials - Politics and Shopping!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Return of the King</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/10/15/the-return-of-the-king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/10/15/the-return-of-the-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harlequinade.biz/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure whether to hang out the flags or open a vein?
One of the best, most widely loved [and one of very few actually memorable] movies in modern Hollywood history is getting a sequel. Oliver Stone&#8217;s glorious 1987 hymn of praise to the joys and pains of unquenchable avarice, &#8220;Wall Street,&#8221; is being fast-tracked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;m not sure whether to hang out the flags or open a vein?<a href="http://harlequinade.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wall-street.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-257" title="wall-street" src="http://harlequinade.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wall-street.jpg" alt="" width="207" height="228" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">One of the best, most widely loved [and one of very few actually <em>memorable</em>] movies in modern Hollywood history is getting a sequel. Oliver Stone&#8217;s glorious 1987 hymn of praise to the joys and pains of unquenchable avarice, &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094291/ " target="_blank">Wall Street</a>,&#8221; is being fast-tracked by Fox for what some might say is a long-overdue second verse.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The movie, currently titled, “Money Never Sleeps” will focus on the life of Gordon Gekko as he emerges from prison, having served his time for past indiscretions. Michael Douglas has made it known he&#8217;s interested in reprising the role that deservedly secured him an Oscar, but he&#8217;s waiting for a script before actually inking the deal.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On the surface, this is wonderful news. The first movie had a viable plot, tangible characters and an overall premise you could actually believe; Which makes it depressingly rare. And with an eleven-year gap since its iconic parent, Fox can hardly be accused of &#8216;cashing-in&#8217; with a quick, trashy sequel.  Even the script is being crafted by Allan Loeb who&#8217;s a former Wall Street trader, so the bloodline on this project is looking superb. The only sour note is that Charlie Sheen is not currently due to return.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You certainly can&#8217;t fault the timing. The King of Wall Street is released from jail, only to find his former kingdom imploding in inexorable meltdown. The story potential is right off the charts! As a  rule I hate sequels as they&#8217;re often no more than a shallow exploitation of the public&#8217;s affection for the original film, but it sounds like we can make an exception?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I don&#8217;t know about you, folks, but I&#8217;m booking my seat. Money never sleeps. And if this film&#8217;s performance  displays even half of its pedigree, until it actually opens I may not be doing much either.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<h5 style="text-align: justify;">Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonythemisfit/ " target="_blank">Tony the Misfit</a></h5>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/10/15/the-return-of-the-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talent Always Shows</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/10/10/talent-always-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/10/10/talent-always-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/talent-always-shows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood&#8217;s creative anemia is advancing at a worrying pace.


As I reported some weeks ago, MGM are in the process of creating what they now call &#8216;a reinvention&#8217; of 1980&#8217;s iconic Oscar-winner, &#8216;Fame.&#8217; Nine talented, new performers have been chosen as the Students, but players of the adult roles are still in discussions. Debbie Allen will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:justify;color:#333399;"><span style="color: #000080;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SO_AH5PjDnI/AAAAAAAAANk/yXTIvVR9lWE/s1600-h/ballet-shoes-small.jpg"><img style="float:right;cursor:pointer;margin:0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SO_AH5PjDnI/AAAAAAAAANk/yXTIvVR9lWE/s320/ballet-shoes-small.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>Hollywood&#8217;s creative anemia is advancing at a worrying pace.</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;color:#333399;"><span style="color: #000080;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;color:#333399;"><span style="color: #000080;">As I reported <a href="http://www.harlequinade.biz/2008/09/lets-just-remake-hollywood.html">some weeks ago</a>, MGM are in the process of creating what they now call &#8216;a reinvention&#8217; of 1980&#8217;s iconic Oscar-winner, &#8216;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080716/">Fame</a>.&#8217; Nine talented, new performers have been chosen as the Students, but players of the adult roles are still in discussions. Debbie Allen will even add a nod of approval from the original with a [hopefully meaningful] cameo role. Shooting is due to start late next month.</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;color:#333399;">
<p><span style="color: #000080;">The budget for this remake [And let's be honest, that's what it is. 'Reinvention' is just a way to say 'recycled idea' without sounding as creatively desperate as you actually are,] is $25-million. Which in Hollywood terms is pocket change! And that&#8217;s another reason why <span style="font-style:italic;">every</span> new Actor deserves the same kind of break as this movie should give those at its core.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Any Actor who demands $50m or more just to get out of bed is an over-sized ego, with legs. And whoever who pays it is that Actor&#8217;s fool. Give the freshmen a worthwhile chance and the results can burn holes in the screen. New Actors have a passion their more experienced peers ceased to feel or care about years ago. But the $50M guys put butts in the seats, so <span style="font-style:italic;">they</span> get all of the breaks. And that&#8217;s sad.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">For those too young to remember, &#8216;Fame&#8217; is the story of the joys and despairs felt by hyper-talented teens and their mentors during a year of devotion [and copious sweating] at the High School for the Performing Arts in New York. The original movie set box-office records and quite rightly collected two Oscars. I hold no such hopes for its parody&#8217;s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">The movie will debut on September 25 and I wish its new stars <span style="font-style:italic;">boundless</span> success. I just think Hollywood should give its nascent new talent a more worthy, <span style="font-style:italic;">original</span> showcase.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><span style="font-size:78%;">Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/megyarsh/">Megyarsh</a></span></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/10/10/talent-always-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood&#8217;s newest &#8216;Bright, Shiny Object&#8217;&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/30/hollywoods-newest-bright-shiny-object/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/30/hollywoods-newest-bright-shiny-object/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/hollywoods-newest-bright-shiny-object/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood is filled with grown men [and women] who seem to share one common weakness; An inadequate supply of toys during childhood. Stories of Directors demanding bigger, better and costlier toys for their next creative indulgence are legion. And next on their wishlist appears to be Imax.
&#8220;Batman, TDK&#8221; includes six scenes that were created in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:justify;color:rgb(51,51,153);"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SOJ9JbyrtzI/AAAAAAAAALs/9UYCO6gX-LU/s1600-h/IMAX2.jpg"><img style="float:right;cursor:pointer;width:240px;height:296px;margin:0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SOJ9JbyrtzI/AAAAAAAAALs/9UYCO6gX-LU/s320/IMAX2.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Hollywood is filled with grown men [and women] who seem to share one common weakness; An inadequate supply of toys during childhood. Stories of Directors demanding bigger, better and costlier toys for their next creative indulgence are legion. And next on their wishlist appears to be Imax.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(51,51,153);text-align:justify;">&#8220;Batman, TDK&#8221; includes six scenes that were created in Imax as a way to lure audiences to more profitable Imax cinemas to enjoy the effect. To date, it has produced $60+ million from those screens, and several Directors have seized on this fact as consummate proof how essential it is that <span style="font-style:italic;">they</span> get to play with this shiny, new toy.</p>
<p>According to Variety, Transformers 2 will include three scenes shot in Imax. Iron Man 2 will also include some Imax scenes, and several pictures in pre-production are now being considered for similar treatment.</p>
<p>No-one would argue that DVD&#8217;s have shredded a movie&#8217;s Box Office potential and studios need a way to get people back into theaters to watch the films there instead. It&#8217;s more profitable. But Imax isn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>Audiences don&#8217;t stay home because the format is wrong. They stay home because they&#8217;re tired of intellectually vapid, comic-inspired, derivative sequels. Imax is 70mm and produces resolution you could <span style="font-style:italic;">shave</span> with. But crud in 70mm is still crud. Make an original, intelligent movie with a strong script, a believable premise and a well-chosen cast and the audience won&#8217;t care if it&#8217;s in Super-8! Choose any other path and the fault is your own.</p>
<p>Transformers 2 is booked for a simultaneous debut on regular <span style="font-style:italic;">and</span> Imax screens on June 26. Let&#8217;s see who has the mental acuity to learn this small lesson in time.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:85%;"><br />Imax photo by: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/laffy4k/">Laffy4k</a></span><br />~~~<br /> ARTICLEURL                      </div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">© 2008, Harlequinade, Inc. If you are not reading<br />
this via an RSS feed from www.Harlequinade.biz, the<br />
site you are on is a thief. Please report them to us.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/30/hollywoods-newest-bright-shiny-object/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s just remake Hollywood !</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/25/lets-just-remake-hollywood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/25/lets-just-remake-hollywood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/lets-just-remake-hollywood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of a brilliant and dazzlingly creative scheme to escape the torment of their recent financial morass, MGM has decided to blaze a new trail in Hollywood and make a entirely new movie, based on a completely original idea.
Sorry&#8230;Just kidding – They&#8217;re going to remake Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.
The 1988 original, helmed by Frank Oz, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SNxUfuycj5I/AAAAAAAAALU/wCAFbhbXKXk/s1600-h/MGM+Cat.jpg"><img style="float:right;cursor:pointer;width:280px;height:174px;margin:0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SNxUfuycj5I/AAAAAAAAALU/wCAFbhbXKXk/s200/MGM+Cat.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="color:rgb(51,51,153);">As part of a brilliant and dazzlingly creative scheme to escape the torment of their recent financial morass, MGM has decided to blaze a new trail in Hollywood and make a entirely new movie, based on a completely original idea.</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;color:rgb(51,51,153);">Sorry&#8230;Just kidding – They&#8217;re going to remake Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.</p>
<p>The 1988 original, helmed by Frank Oz, is one of the most forgettable films to ever stimulate the human synapses. And now they want to do it<span style="font-style:italic;"> again</span>. And this probably won&#8217;t be the last time. No-one has signed on to have their careers blighted by this travesty yet, but A-list talent is [claimed] to be reviewing the project with interest.</p>
<p>And it doesn&#8217;t end there: MGM also have remakes of Red Dawn, Robocop, Fame and Poltergeist in development. Robocop I can almost understand – The original is a kitschy classic, but it was hollow. They made a good idea&#8230;badly. It might actually do better in remake. And Poltergeist has been re-made as every shlock-horror flick of the last twenty years, so that&#8217;s a moot point. Red Dawn was a good movie, but without Patrick it&#8217;s doomed to be a messy pastiche of its former self. Not a good idea.</p>
<p>But my favorite item from MGM&#8217;s public confession of creative inadequacy is Fame. Released on May 16th, 1980 it was a box office juggernaut and won two Oscars. So at 28 years old it was made <span style="font-style:italic;">years</span> before any of the audience MGM hope to sell it to this time, so they&#8217;ll think it&#8217;s a new idea. Add the two Oscars and it doesn&#8217;t take a mental giant to see the appeal.</p>
<p>But the funniest part is the subject matter. Set at NYC&#8217;s High School for the Performing Arts, it [at least, the <span style="font-style:italic;">original</span> of it] contains more action and movement in one scene than a 2008 teenager has experienced in their entire cosseted, Wii-thrashing  lives.</p>
<p>MGM are clearly thinking it was huge in 1980, so it can be huge again now. Wrong! 1980 was a different world &#8211; Wii&#8217;s didn&#8217;t exist, PS3&#8217;s didn&#8217;t exist. Cellphones were the size of dictionaries, and computers were large, clunky boxes in the corners of science labs, and could only be touched by odd little men with white lab coats and terminal acne. A 2003 teen would call it the stone age. And looking back, I&#8217;d agree. But that&#8217;s just the point: Make a movie about &#8216;The NYC Academy of Txt Msgng&#8217; and you&#8217;d have lines round the block! But show today&#8217;s teens a movie where intelligent people who are not on medication indulge voluntarily in frantic activity that leaves every inch of their bodies hosed in sweat, and they&#8217;ll think it&#8217;s a cult. Or some kind of torture.</p>
<p>They move their fingers to type, or their thumbs to talk. Show them more exertion than that and the only thing they&#8217;ll move is their butts&#8230;Towards another movie! I can only wish MGM well with their forthcoming flop&#8230;And feel <span>deeply</span><span style="font-style:italic;"> </span>relieved it&#8217;s not <span style="font-style:italic;">my</span> money at stake.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:85%;">MGM Cat photo by: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/00ucci/285494861/">00ucci</a></span><br />~~~<br /> ARTICLEURL                      </div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">© 2008, Harlequinade, Inc. If you are not reading<br />
this via an RSS feed from www.Harlequinade.biz, the<br />
site you are on is a thief. Please report them to us.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/25/lets-just-remake-hollywood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Arrogant Arachnid&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/08/the-arrogant-arachnid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/08/the-arrogant-arachnid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/the-arrogant-arachnid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, boys and girls, you can sleep easy tonight; After what seems like weeks of self-directed – and entirely self-serving – stories of doom and despair, Sony Pictures has just confirmed that Toby Maguire will be back in Spiderman 4.
So, this earth-shattering anti-climax invokes two vital questions:
A) Is there anyone out there with the intellectual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SMXXtBAYlmI/AAAAAAAAAJE/soOYL8T5nCs/s1600-h/Loxoceles_reclusa.jpg"><img style="float:right;cursor:pointer;margin:0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SMXXtBAYlmI/AAAAAAAAAJE/soOYL8T5nCs/s320/Loxoceles_reclusa.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="color:rgb(51,51,153);">Well, boys and girls, you can sleep easy tonight; After what seems like weeks of self-directed – and entirely self-serving – stories of doom and despair, Sony Pictures has just confirmed that Toby Maguire </span><span style="font-style:italic;color:rgb(51,51,153);">will</span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,153);"> be back in Spiderman 4.</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;color:rgb(51,51,153);">So, this earth-shattering anti-climax invokes two vital questions:</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">A) </span>Is there anyone out there with the intellectual evolution to tie their own shoes that believed for a moment he actually <span style="font-style:italic;">wouldn&#8217;t</span>?</p>
<p>&#8230;and <span style="font-weight:bold;">B)</span> Does the world really <span style="font-style:italic;">need</span> a Spiderman 4??</p>
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m mis-reading the clues but this has all the hallmarks of yet another tiresome crusade to manipulate the public to gain free PR;  You present the media with a &#8216;tragic&#8217; scenario, then sit back in palm-buffing glee as they slavishly report your onanistic fallacy like it had the smallest scintilla of a chance to be fact. Then, once the resultant furor has peaked, you issue a <span style="font-style:italic;">second </span>announcement, informing what you indulgently perceive as a panic-stricken world that this fearful circumstance &#8211; which was never real to begin with &#8211; has been miraculously averted, thanks to the selfless dedication of the same malfeasant half-wits who caused its creation.</p>
<p>Result? <span style="font-style:italic;">Two</span> non-stories for the price of one, and long [profitable] lines at the Box Office.</p>
<p>And those who make movies are far from the only ones guilty of this insulting charade; Pick any performing medium and you&#8217;ll find the same brainless knavery; Self-inflicted drug &#8216;addiction&#8217;, Cows cut in half and embedded in plastic, two faded movie starlets kissing in public [in front of every camera they could possibly find,] declaring your candidacy against John McCain&#8230;three months before the election&#8230;.The list is as endless as it is disrespectful.</p>
<p>As the audience, we deserve higher regard. Show us a performer imbued with genuine talent and we&#8217;ll make them a legend without further delay. It has been thus since the dawn of  movies in those halcyon days of the roaring 20&#8217;s. But woe betide s/he who practices trickery – Despite the corrosive effects of the cranial oatmeal that forms the majority of American TV we still have an intellect, and we neither appreciate nor deserve its being abused or insulted for exploitative gain.</p>
<p>Quite how we can counter this sickening trend has yet to be clear, but we need to do <span style="font-style:italic;">something </span>or it can only get worse [If that's possible.] Suggestions of ways to achieve our redress are hereby invited. Meantime, I&#8217;m off to rest in a darkened room with 10lbs of Hershey&#8217;s, while my brain recovers from this latest assault.</p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(255,255,255);">actor, blog, blogging, carpet, celebrity, DVD, entertainment, fame, film, health, Hollywood, income, media, money, movie, series, soap, television, video</span></div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">© 2008, Harlequinade, Inc. If you are not reading<br />
this via an RSS feed from www.Harlequinade.biz, the<br />
site you are on is a thief. Please report them to us.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/09/08/the-arrogant-arachnid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Klaatu, barada&#8230;.Nix this!</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/08/11/klaatu-baradanix-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/08/11/klaatu-baradanix-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/klaatu-baradanix-this/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s widely acknowledged that those in charge of &#8216;Tinsel Town&#8217; are out of ideas. In such a position, the overwhelming  temptation is to do something that was already successful. And it&#8217;s always an  overwhelming mistake.

The 39 Steps, Brief Encounter, Sabrina and War of the Worlds, for example, have all been re-made; And in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SKEjhZtIjmI/AAAAAAAAAD8/yfu-rCmrgxk/s1600-h/Plan9Saucer.jpg"><img style="float:right;cursor:pointer;width:226px;height:184px;margin:0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__LAriKLoOqs/SKEjhZtIjmI/AAAAAAAAAD8/yfu-rCmrgxk/s320/Plan9Saucer.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="color:rgb(51,51,153);">It&#8217;s widely acknowledged that those in charge of &#8216;Tinsel Town&#8217; are out of ideas. In such a position, the overwhelming  temptation is to do something that was already successful. And it&#8217;s always an  overwhelming mistake.</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;color:rgb(51,51,153);">
<div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,153);">The 39 Steps, Brief Encounter, Sabrina and War of the Worlds, for example, have all been re-made; And in every case the results were inferior and unmitigated failures.</span></div>
<p>So, of course, our friends in LA have decided to do it again.</p>
<p>20th Century Fox describe the upcoming and wholly inexcusable re-make of the 1951 sci-fi classic, &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0043456/">The Day the Earth Stood Still</a>&#8221; as &#8216;a contemporary reinvention&#8217;&#8230;which is enough to chill  any movie buff&#8217;s blood before you even finish the the press release! The plot concerns Klaatu, an alien who crosses the vastness of space to educate our feudal society on the need for peace among the worlds, promptly causing a degree of incoherent panic  not seen since the Jonas boys were in town.</p>
<p>The original starred the unique (and perfectly cast) Mr. Michael Rennie. In this hideous re-tread his role will be played by Keanu&#8230;.Need I say more?</p>
<p>Assuming the effects of whatever herbal medication it took to convince so many people that this glorious and iconic movie was in the slightest need of &#8216;reinvention&#8217; don&#8217;t wear off by then, &#8216;The Day the Earth Stood Still&#8217; is scheduled to open on December 12th.</p>
<p>If there was ever a perfect time tor the Vogons to arrive, that date is now it.<br /><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6mouqe"><br /></a></div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">© 2008, Harlequinade, Inc. If you are not reading<br />
this via an RSS feed from www.Harlequinade.biz, the<br />
site you are on is a thief. Please report them to us.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2008/08/11/klaatu-baradanix-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WGA, Day Two &#8211; Already it&#8217;s a Sequel !</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/11/06/wga-day-two-already-its-a-sequel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/11/06/wga-day-two-already-its-a-sequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writer —]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/wga-day-two-already-its-a-sequel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the Writers strike is already bearing some fruit. First, the Producers are getting worried [That's good.] Second, some of the most mediocre examples of the television medium will vanish, or fade to re-runs as their scripts disappear. &#8216;Desperate Housewives,” &#8220;Back to You,&#8221; &#8220;&#8216;Til Death,&#8221; &#8220;Two and a Half Men,” “Old Christine,” and others [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the Writers strike is already bearing some fruit. First, the Producers are getting worried [That's good.] Second, some of the most mediocre examples of the television medium will vanish, or fade to re-runs as their scripts disappear. &#8216;Desperate Housewives,” &#8220;Back to You,&#8221; &#8220;&#8216;Til Death,&#8221; &#8220;Two and a Half Men,” “Old Christine,” and others will all be put on &#8216;pause&#8217; for the duration; We could be free of them for as much as 22-weeks. Oh, joy, Oh, happy day!</p>
<p>As you know I&#8217;m entirely in support of the Writers, but to be rid of those shows for a protracted period <em>and</em> know these deeply under-valued people don&#8217;t have to write them for a while is double the delight.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, &#8220;Dancing With the Stars,&#8221; which for reasons that are an implacable mystery to me, does staggeringly well in the ratings, was shot on schedule, but the Hosts had to ad-lib&#8230;So let me get this straight; People who claim to be talented, creative performers had to watch another group of [allegedly] talented people do a dance routine they&#8217;d already seen numerous times at rehearsals&#8230;.and come up with their <em>own</em> opinion?</p>
<p>Oh, the humanity?!</p>
<p>Shooting for &#8220;Housewives&#8221; will end tomorrow as they&#8217;re already out of scripts. Shows already in the can won&#8217;t even last to Christmas, and attempts by the media to discover how ABC plans to placate the <em>legions</em> of &#8216;Housewives&#8217; fans were referred to the company making the show.</p>
<p>So the Networks are not only pulling a whole list of shows early to bait the the viewers into hating the Writers, they&#8217;re even passing the buck when Reporters try to find out what those viewers can expect to endure next?? And <em>this</em> from the group who claim they &#8216;made every good faith effort to negotiate a deal.&#8217;</p>
<p>Do you suppose their fingers were crossed when they said that?</p>
<p>It gets worse; Tricky though the situation might be for anyone seeking televisual fare possessed of more creativity than a test pattern, the long-term implications almost chill the blood; Once the Writers win&#8230;and they must,&#8230;whatever deal they achieve is almost certain to be used as the game-plan by Actors and Directors when <em>their</em> contracts expire next June.</p>
<p>Think of it &#8212; the Writers might only just be back at work, and the <em>Actors</em> could lose faith in the bosses and walk out&#8230;And this could start all over again!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s times like these I wish I had shares in Netflix.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" title="Bookmark using any bookmark manager!" target="_blank"><img src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" alt="Bookmark using any bookmark manager !" border="0" height="16" width="125" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/11/06/wga-day-two-already-its-a-sequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WGA &#8211; Day II&#8230;Already it&#8217;s a Sequel!</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/11/06/wga-day-iialready-its-a-sequel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/11/06/wga-day-iialready-its-a-sequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[producer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/wga-day-iialready-its-a-sequel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the Writers strike is already bearing some fruit. First, the Producers are getting worried [That's good.] Second, some of the most mediocre examples of the television medium will fade to re-runs as their scripts disappear. &#8216;Desperate Housewives,” &#8220;Back to You,&#8221; &#8220;&#8216;Til Death,&#8221; &#8220;Two and a Half Men,” “Old Christine,” and others will all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:justify;color:rgb(51,51,153);">It seems the Writers strike is already bearing some fruit. First, the Producers are getting worried [That's good.] Second, some of the most mediocre examples of the television medium will fade to re-runs as their scripts disappear. &#8216;Desperate Housewives,” &#8220;Back to You,&#8221; &#8220;&#8216;Til Death,&#8221; &#8220;Two and a Half Men,” “Old Christine,” and others will all be put on &#8216;pause&#8217; for the duration of the strike; So we could be free of them for as much as 22-<span>weeks</span>. Oh, joy, Oh, happy day!</p>
<p>As you know, I&#8217;m entirely in support of the Writers, but to be rid of those shows for a protracted period <span style="font-style:italic;">and</span> know these deeply under-valued people don&#8217;t have to write them for a while is double the delight.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, &#8220;Dancing With the Stars,&#8221; which for reasons that are an implacable mystery to me, does staggeringly well in the ratings, was shot on schedule, but the Hosts were forced to  ad-lib&#8230;So let me get this straight; People who claim to be talented and creative had to watch another group of people do a dance routine they&#8217;d already seen numerous times at rehearsals&#8230;and come up with their <span style="font-style:italic;">own</span> opinion.</p>
<p>Oh, the humanity?!</p>
<p>Shooting for &#8220;Housewives&#8221; will end tomorrow as they&#8217;re already out of scripts. Shows already in the can won&#8217;t even last to Christmas, and attempts by the media to discover how ABC plans to placate the legions of &#8216;Housewives&#8217; fans were referred to the company making the show.</p>
<p>So the Networks are not only pulling a whole <span style="font-style:italic;">list</span> of shows early to bait the the viewers into hating the Writers, they&#8217;re even passing the buck when Reporters try to find out what those viewers can expect to endure next??</p>
<p>And <span style="font-style:italic;">this</span> from the group who claim they &#8216;made every good faith effort to negotiate a deal.&#8217; Do you suppose their fingers were crossed when they said that?</p>
<p>It gets worse; Tricky though the situation might be for anyone seeking televisual fare possessed of more creativity than a test pattern, the long-term implications almost chill the blood; Once the Writers win,&#8230;and they must&#8230;whatever deal <span style="font-style:italic;">they</span> achieve is almost certain to be used as the game-plan by Actors and Directors when <span style="font-style:italic;">their</span> contracts expire next June.</p>
<p>Think of it &#8212; the Writers might only just be back at work, and the Actors could lose faith in the same bosses and walk out&#8230;And this could start all over again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s times like these I wish I had shares in Netflix.</div>
<p>
<p><a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" title="Bookmark using any bookmark manager!" target="_blank"><img src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" width="125" height="16" border="0" alt="Bookmark using any bookmark manager !" /></a>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">© 2008, Harlequinade, Inc. If you are not reading<br />
this via an RSS feed from www.Harlequinade.biz, the<br />
site you are on is a thief. Please report them to us.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/11/06/wga-day-iialready-its-a-sequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Laugh at Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/10/23/dont-laugh-at-laughlin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/10/23/dont-laugh-at-laughlin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/dont-laugh-at-laughlin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The season has barely started, yet the blood-letting is well under way. Yesterday, CBS canceled the Hugh Jackman-helmed quasi-musical, &#8220;Viva Laughlin,&#8221;. Billed as &#8216;an offbeat song-and-dance drama&#8217; it achieved such jaw-droppingly bad ratings, CBS pulled the plug after just two airings.This is the second cancellation in what is still a young season. The [dubious] honor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;" align="justify">The season has barely started, yet the blood-letting is well under way. Yesterday, CBS canceled the Hugh Jackman-helmed quasi-musical, &#8220;Viva Laughlin,&#8221;. Billed as &#8216;an offbeat song-and-dance drama&#8217; it achieved such jaw-droppingly bad ratings, CBS pulled the plug after just two airings.This is the second cancellation in what is still a young season. The [dubious] honor of being first went to &#8220;Online Nation,&#8221; on the CW. &#8220;Laughlin,&#8221; meanwhile, debuted last Thursday with only 8.4-million viewers — dropping over half the 21.2-million fed to it by that time-seasoned ratings superstar, &#8220;CSI&#8221;. The second episode scored only 6.8-million. On the radar of TV numbers, that&#8217;s not even a blip.</p>
<p align="justify">But is this dismal performance really such a surprise? &#8216;Laughlin&#8217; was a copy of the BBC show, &#8216;Viva Blackpool,&#8217; which itself was a copy of BBC&#8217;s &#8216;The Singing Detective,&#8221; which was the sequel to &#8220;Pennies from Heaven&#8221; &#8211; a musically tinged example of the peerless production values of the BBC, which debuted to rave reviews in 1980.</p>
<p align="justify">So we&#8217;re talking about a show that is&#8230;.<span style="font-style:italic;">was</span>!&#8230;a facsimile, of a clone, of a sequel, of a classic.</p>
<p align="justify">Who in their right minds ever green-lit something with <span style="font-style:italic;">that</span> weak a lineage?? And why only cancel the <span style="font-style:italic;">show</span> &#8212; Let&#8217;s also delete the aesthetically-stunted overpaid suits who approved it!</p>
<p align="justify">&#8216;Laughlin&#8217; will be replaced with a warmed-over &#8220;CSI&#8221; for one week, then &#8220;The Amazing Race&#8221; will start its new Season.  Let&#8217;s hope CBS achieves better numbers with the Racers.</p>
<p align="justify">After the laughable &#8216;Laughlin&#8217; their numbers have nowhere to <span style="font-style:italic;">go</span> but up!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" title="Bookmark using any bookmark manager!" target="_blank"><img src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" width="125" height="16" border="0" alt="AddThis Social Bookmark Button" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/10/23/dont-laugh-at-laughlin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wanted: A Beeuummb !</title>
		<link>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/08/09/wanted-a-beeuummb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/08/09/wanted-a-beeuummb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelimey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlequinguy.wordpress.com/2007/08/09/wanted-a-beeuummb/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yet another sad display of Hollywood&#8217;s repulsive fetish for placing profit above all other concerns it was announced yesterday that Andy Garcia, John Cleese, Alfred Molina and Aishwarya Rai will be joining Steve Martin in Columbia Pictures/MGM&#8217;s avarice-driven sequel &#8220;The Pink Panther 2.&#8221; Jean Reno and Emily Mortimer will also reprise their roles.The sequel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;">In yet another sad display of Hollywood&#8217;s repulsive fetish for placing profit above all other concerns it was announced yesterday that Andy Garcia, John Cleese, Alfred Molina and Aishwarya Rai will be joining Steve Martin in Columbia Pictures/MGM&#8217;s avarice-driven sequel &#8220;The Pink Panther 2.&#8221; Jean Reno and Emily Mortimer will also reprise their roles.The sequel was announced in March 2006 and is due for release on Feb. 13, 2009. Harald Zwart, best known for “Agent Cody Banks,&#8221; is taking over Directing duties from Shawn Levy. Robert Simonds is producing; Ira Shuman will serve as the Exec Producer.</p>
<p>The singular Mr. John Cleese will play Chief Inspector Dreyfus. Garcia, Molina and Rai have signed on as Detectives and experts who join forces with Clouseau to catch a thief who&#8217;s been stealing artifacts all over the world.</p>
<p>In a telling footnote to the press release, Columbia / MGM mention that Steve Martin&#8217;s original outing as the lovably inept Detective so indelibly and perfectly defined by Peter Sellers earned them over $140 million worldwide. This, apparently, is adequate cause to justify the production of a movie whose single and unequivocal reason for existence is to exploit and profit from the legacy of a performer whose shoes Mr. Martin is too untalented to polish.</p>
<p>Could someone please enlighten the Hollywood suits that when a character has been as expertly crafted and made the focus of immense public affection as this one was by Peter, once that Actor passes, common decency requires that this should also be the end of that character&#8217;s usage?</p>
<p>For once, gentlemen, at least <span style="font-style:italic;">try</span> to ignore your incessant lust for profits, and show some respect!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" title="Bookmark using any bookmark manager!" target="_blank"><img src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" alt="AddThis Social Bookmark Button" border="0" height="16" width="125" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harlequinade.org/2007/08/09/wanted-a-beeuummb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
